Happiness and Human Flourishing in Kant's Ethics: THOMAS E. HILL, JR

Social Philosophy and Policy 16 (1):143-175 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ancient moral philosophers, especially Aristotle and his followers, typically shared the assumption that ethics is primarily concerned with how to achieve the final end for human beings, a life of “happiness” or “human flourishing.” This final end was not a subjective condition, such as contentment or the satisfaction of our preferences, but a life that could be objectively determined to be appropriate to our nature as human beings. Character traits were treated as moral virtues because they contributed well toward this ideal life, either as means to it or as constitutive aspects of it. Traits that tended to prevent a “happy” life were considered vices, even if they contributed to a life that was pleasant and what a person most wanted. The idea of “happiness” was central, then, in philosophical efforts to specify what we ought to do, what sort of persons we should try to become, and what sort of life a wise person would hope for.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Full Human Flourishing.Mark K. Spencer - 2007 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 81:193-204.
Kant on Happiness in the Moral Life.Gary Watson - 1983 - Philosophy Research Archives 9:79-108.
Kant on Happiness in the Moral Life.Gary Watson - 1983 - Philosophy Research Archives 9:79-108.
The Nicomachean Ethics.Aristotle . (ed.) - 1926 - New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press UK.
Full Human Flourishing.Mark K. Spencer - 2007 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 81:193-204.
Human flourishing.Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) - 1999 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
169 (#111,494)

6 months
14 (#170,561)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

The Kantian Moral Hazard Argument for religious fictionalism.Christopher Jay - 2014 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 75 (3):207-232.
What’s So Good about the Good Will? An Ontological Critique of Kant’s Axiomatic Moral Construct.Necip Fikri Alican - 2022 - Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 18 (1):422–467.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Modern Moral Philosophy.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1958 - Philosophy 33 (124):1 - 19.
Two concepts of rules.John Rawls - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (1):3-32.
Principia Ethica.Evander Bradley McGilvary - 1904 - Philosophical Review 13 (3):351.

View all 29 references / Add more references