British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (1):215-245 (2016)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Research in vision science, developmental psychology, and the foundations of cognitive science has led some theorists to posit referential mechanisms similar to indices. This hypothesis has been framed within a Fodorian conception of the early vision module. The article shows that this conception is mistaken, for it cannot handle the ‘interface problem’—roughly, how indexing mechanisms relate to higher cognition and conceptual thought. As a result, I reject the inaccessibility of early vision to higher cognition and make some constructive remarks on the perception–cognition interface. -/- 1 The Case for Visual Indices
1.1 Preliminary assumptions
1.2 Transcendental arguments
1.3 Evidence from vision science
2 Visual Indices, Object Files, and Fodorian Modularity
3 The Interface Problem
3.1 Top-down attention and modularity
3.2 Selective attention and information
4 Revising the Indexing Hypothesis
4.1 Revising the perception–cognition interface
4.2 Revising the modularity of early vision
5 Concluding Remarks.
|
Keywords | Visual tracking Modularity Informational encapsulation Object cognition Cognitive architecture Early vision Object files Attention |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 2016 |
DOI | 10.1093/bjps/axu033 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Computation and Cognition: Toward a Foundation for Cognitive Science.Zenon W. Pylyshyn - 1984 - Cambridge: MIT Press.
Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension.Andy Clark (ed.) - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology.Jerry A. Fodor - 1983 - Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
View all 66 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
What Is an Object File?E. J. Green & Jake Quilty-Dunn - 2021 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72 (3):665-699.
Cognitive Penetration, Perceptual Learning and Neural Plasticity.Ariel S. Cecchi - 2014 - Dialectica 68 (1):63-95.
Similar books and articles
Is Vision Continuous with Cognition?: The Case for Cognitive Impenetrability of Visual Perception.Zenon Pylyshyn - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):341-365.
What and Where in the Human Visual System: Two Hierarchies of Visual Modules.L. M. Vaina - 1990 - Synthese 83 (1):49-91.
The Objects of Action and Perception.M. A. Goodale & G. K. Humphrey - 1998 - Cognition 67 (1-2):181-207.
Vision and Cognition: How Do They Connect?Zenon Pylyshyn - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):401-414.
Vision and Cognition: Drawing the Line.Andrew Hollingworth & John M. Henderson - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):380-381.
Ways of Seeing: The Scope and Limits of Visual Cognition.Pierre Jacob & Marc Jeannerod - 2003 - Oxford University Press.
Defending Realism on the Proper Ground.Athanassios Raftopoulos - 2006 - Philosophical Psychology 19 (1):47-77.
Perception and Cognition: Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology.Gary Carl Hatfield - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Visual Spatial Constancy and Modularity: Does Intention Penetrate Vision?Wayne Wu - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (2):647-669.
COGNITIVE (IM)PENETRABILITY OF VISION: RESTRICTING VISION Vs. RESTRICTING COGNITION.Costas Pagondiotis - 2015 - In J. Zeimbekis & A. Raftopoulos (eds.), Cognitive Penetrability. Oxford University Press. pp. 378-403.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2014-12-05
Total views
298 ( #35,633 of 2,507,867 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #58,614 of 2,507,867 )
2014-12-05
Total views
298 ( #35,633 of 2,507,867 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #58,614 of 2,507,867 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads