Evolutionary forces and the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium

Biology and Philosophy 30 (3):423-437 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium has been argued by Sober, Stephens and others to represent the zero-force state for evolutionary biology understood as a theory of forces. I investigate what it means for a model to involve forces, developing an explicit account by defining what the zero-force state is in a general theoretical context. I use this account to show that Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium is not the zero-force state in biology even in the contexts in which it applies, and argue based on this that drift should not be understood as an evolutionary force

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Forces and Causes in Evolutionary Theory.Christopher Stephens - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (5):716-727.
Explanation and the Evolutionary First Law.Devin Y. Gouvêa - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (3):363-382.
Drift and evolutionary forces: scrutinizing the Newtonian analogy.Víctor J. Luque - 2016 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 31 (3):397-410.
The Principle of Stasis: Why drift is not a Zero-Cause Law.Victor J. Luque - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 57:71-79.
What is natural selection?Björn Brunnander - 2007 - Biology and Philosophy 22 (2):231-246.
The principle of drift: Biology's first law.Robert N. Brandon - 2006 - Journal of Philosophy 103 (7):319-335.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-09-30

Downloads
36 (#457,838)

6 months
7 (#491,170)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eugene Earnshaw-Whyte
University of Toronto