Journal of Philosophy 103 (7):319-335 (2006)
Abstract |
Drift is to evolution as inertia is to Newtonian mechanics. Both are the "natural" or default states of the systems to which they apply. Both are governed by zero-force laws. The zero-force
law in biology is stated here for the first time.
|
Keywords | Analytic Philosophy Contemporary Philosophy |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | 0022-362X |
DOI | 10.5840/jphil2006103723 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
What Makes a Scientific Explanation Distinctively Mathematical?Marc Lange - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (3):485-511.
The Pomp of Superfluous Causes: The Interpretation of Evolutionary Theory.Denis M. Walsh - 2007 - Philosophy of Science 74 (3):281-303.
Four Pillars of Statisticalism.Denis M. Walsh, André Ariew & Mohan Matthen - 2017 - Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology 9 (1):1-18.
Drift and “Statistically Abstractive Explanation”.Mohan Matthen - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (4):464-487.
Really Statistical Explanations and Genetic Drift.Marc Lange - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (2):169-188.
View all 47 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
What is Drift? A Response to Millstein, Skipper, and Dietrich.Mohan Matthen - 2010 - Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology 2 (20130604).
Drift: A Historical and Conceptual Overview.Anya Plutynski - 2007 - Biological Theory 2 (2):156-167.
Are Random Drift and Natural Selection Conceptually Distinct?Roberta L. Millstein - 2002 - Biology and Philosophy 17 (1):33-53.
Puzzles for ZFEL, McShea and Brandon’s Zero Force Evolutionary Law.Martin Barrett, Hayley Clatterbuck, Michael Goldsby, Casey Helgeson, Brian McLoone, Trevor Pearce, Elliott Sober, Reuben Stern & Naftali Weinberger - 2012 - Biology and Philosophy 27 (5):723-735.
Distinguishing Drift and Selection Empirically: "The Great Snail Debate" of the 1950s.Roberta L. Millstein - 2007 - Journal of the History of Biology 41 (2):339-367.
Wandering Drunks and General Lawlessness in Biology: Does Diversity and Complexity Tend to Increase in Evolutionary Systems?: Daniel W. McShea and Robert N. Brandon: Biology’s First Law: The Tendency for Diversity and Complexity to Increase in Evolutionary Systems, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, London, 2010.Lindell Bromham - 2011 - Biology and Philosophy 26 (6):915-933.
The Difference Between Selection and Drift: A Reply to Millstein. [REVIEW]Robert N. Brandon - 2005 - Biology and Philosophy 20 (1):153-170.
Random Drift and the Omniscient Viewpoint.Roberta L. Millstein - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (3):S10-S18.
Selection Vs. Drift: A Response to Brandon’s Reply.Roberta L. Millstein - 2005 - Biology and Philosophy 20 (1):171-175.
What's Wrong with the Emergentist Statistical Interpretation of Natural Selection and Random Drift.Robert N. Brandon & Grant Ramsey - 2007 - In David L. Hull & Michael Ruse (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge University Press. pp. 66--84.
The Structure of Evolution by Natural Selection.Richmond Campbell & Jason Scott Robert - 2005 - Biology and Philosophy 20 (4):673-696.
Review of Daniel W. McShea and Robert N. Brandon, Biology's First Law. [REVIEW]Mohan Matthen - 2011 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2011 (1).
Survival of the Fittest: Law of Evolution or Law of Probability? [REVIEW]David B. Resnik - 1988 - Biology and Philosophy 3 (3):349-362.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2011-02-25
Total views
104 ( #113,892 of 2,518,488 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,186 of 2,518,488 )
2011-02-25
Total views
104 ( #113,892 of 2,518,488 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,186 of 2,518,488 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads