Parental Obligation, Adoption and Abortion: Critique of Porter and Nozickian Alternative

Journal of Value Inquiry 47 (1-2):29-47 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

When True Judges Differ: Reply to Durà‐Vilà.James Shelley - 2015 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 73 (3):345-348.
Adoption is Not Abortion‐Lite.Lindsey Porter - 2012 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (1):63-78.
Reply to Papineau and durà-vilà.Peter J. Lewis - 2009 - Analysis 69 (1):86-89.
Editorial.John Hyman, Derek Matravers & Elisabeth Schellekens - 2017 - British Journal of Aesthetics 57 (1):v-v.
Nozickian epistemology and the value of knowledge.Jonathan L. Kvanvig - 2004 - Philosophical Issues 14 (1):201–218.
Is abortion vicious?Duncan Richter - 1998 - Journal of Value Inquiry 32 (3):381-392.
Procreative responsibilities and the parental obligation objection.Joshua Shaw - 2022 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 43 (2):111-125.
Abortion, personhood, and vagueness.DavidS Levin - 1985 - Journal of Value Inquiry 19 (3):197-209.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-06-10

Downloads
36 (#119,765)

6 months
10 (#1,198,792)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Víctor Durà-Vilà
University of Leeds

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Causes and Conditions.J. L. Mackie - 1965 - American Philosophical Quarterly 2 (4):245 - 264.
Degrees of Causation.Matthew Braham & Martin Hees - 2009 - Erkenntnis 71 (3):323-344.

Add more references