Wilhelm His and mechanistic approaches to development at the time of Entwicklungsmechanik

History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 39 (3):21 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

At the end of the nineteenth century, approaches from experimental physiology made inroads into embryological research. A new generation of embryologists felt urged to study the mechanisms of organ formation. This new program, most prominently defended by Wilhelm Roux, was called Entwicklungsmechanik. Named variously as “causal embryology”, “physiological embryology” or “developmental mechanics”, it catalyzed the movement of embryology from a descriptive science to one exploring causal mechanisms. This article examines the specific scientific and epistemological meaning of the mechanistic approaches of embryological development by focusing on Wilhelm His’ histogenetic work. Roux was neither the first, nor the only one to argue for an experimental exploration of causes in embryology. At the time of Roux, physiological explanations of the genesis of the anatomical forms were developing in parallel, not only in German-speaking countries, but in France, Switzerland and English-speaking countries as well. The experimental approach and the cellular descriptions of embryogenesis were already omni-present when Roux proposed his Entwicklungsmechanik. However, these approaches remained disjointed. It appears that it was Wilhelm His who first succeeded in combining the question of the causal factors determining epigenesis, which was closely connected with experimentation on, and cellular descriptions of, development, in a coherent and concrete synthesis, making him one of the true initiators of the developmental mechanics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mathematics Ab Ovo: Hans Driesch and "Entwicklungsmechanik".Silvia Waisse-Priven & Ana M. Alfonso-Goldfarb - 2009 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 31 (1):35 - 54.
Homeosis and Atavistic Regeneration: the 'Biogenetic Law' in "Entwicklungsmechanik".Stéphane Schmitt - 2003 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 25 (2):193 - 210.
Prinzipielles der Entwickelungsmechanik.Wilhelm Boux - 1921 - Annalen der Philosophie 3 (1):454-473.
Embryology and Evolution 1920-1960: Worlds Apart?Ron Amundson - 2000 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 22 (3):335 - 352.
Mapping Development or How Molecular is Molecular Biology?Soraya de Chadarevian - 2000 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 22 (3):381 - 396.
Metaphors and the privileging of causes.Cor van der Weele - 1993 - Acta Biotheoretica 41 (4):315-327.
Metaphors and the privileging of causes.Cor Weele - 1993 - Acta Biotheoretica 41 (4).

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-14

Downloads
29 (#550,776)

6 months
2 (#1,198,779)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Introduction: sketches of a conceptual history of epigenesis.Antonine Nicoglou & Charles T. Wolfe - 2018 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 40 (4):64.

Add more citations