Ethics revised: Flourishing as vulnerable and dependent. A critical notice of Alasdair Macintyre's dependent rational animals

International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (3):339 – 363 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This Article does not have an abstract

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Macintyre's thomist revival : What next?John Haldane - 1994 - In John Horton & Susan Mendus (eds.), After Macintyre: Critical Perspectives on the Work of Alasdair Macintyre. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.
Alasdair Macintyre : After virtue and after.John Horton & Susan Mendus - 1994 - In John Horton & Susan Mendus (eds.), After Macintyre: Critical Perspectives on the Work of Alasdair Macintyre. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.
Recognising humanity.John Haldane - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (4):301-313.
Macintyre's fusion of history and philosophy.Gordon Graham - 1994 - In John Horton & Susan Mendus (eds.), After Macintyre: Critical Perspectives on the Work of Alasdair Macintyre. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.
Liberal/communitarianism : Macintyre's mesmeric dichotomy.Philip Pettit - 1994 - In John Horton & Susan Mendus (eds.), After Macintyre: Critical Perspectives on the Work of Alasdair Macintyre. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
62 (#260,027)

6 months
9 (#308,593)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Heidegger and the question of animality.Simon Glendinning - 1996 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 4 (1):67 – 86.

Add more references