The Philosophical Significance of Gödei's Theorem

Ratio (Misc.) 5 (2):140 (1963)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

About “The Philosophical Significance of Gödel's Theorem”: Some Issues.Crispin Wright - 1994 - In Brian F. McGuinness & Gianluigi Oliveri (eds.), The Philosophy of Michael Dummett. Dordrecht, Netherland: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 167--202.
On the philosophical significance of Frege's theorem.Crispin Wright - 1997 - In Richard G. Heck (ed.), Language, thought, and logic: essays in honour of Michael Dummett. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 201--44.
More on 'The Philosophical Significance of Gödel's Theorem'.A. W. Moore - 1998 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 55 (1):103-126.
The Philosophical Significance of Gödel's Theorem.Michael Dummett - 1963 - In Michael Dummett & Philip Tartaglia (eds.), Ratio. Duckworth. pp. 186--214.
More on 'The Philosophical Significance of Gödel's Theorem'.A. W. Moore - 1998 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 55 (1):103-126.
Crispin Wright. On the philosophical significance of Frege's theorem. Language, thought, and logic, Essays in honour of Michael Dummett, edited by Richard G. HeckJnr., Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York 1998 , pp. 201–244. - George Boolos. Is Hume's principle analytic? Language, thought, and logic, Essays in honour of Michael Dummett, edited by Richard G. HeckJnr., Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York 1998 , pp. 245–261. - Charles Parsons. Wright on abstraction and set theory. Language, thought, and logic, Essays in honour of Michael Dummett, edited by Richard G. HeckJnr., Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York 1998 , pp. 263–271. - Richard G. HeckJnr. The Julius Caesar objection. Language, thought, and logic, Essays in honour of Michael Dummett, edited by Richard G. HeckJnr., Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York 1998 , pp. 273–308. [REVIEW]William Demopoulos - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (4):1598-1602.
Review. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2006 - Ratio 6 (2):191-194.
Philosophical Theorizing and Particularism: Michael Dummett on Wittgenstein's Later Philosophy of Language.David Pears - 1994 - In Brian F. McGuinness & Gianluigi Oliveri (eds.), The Philosophy of Michael Dummett. Dordrecht, Netherland: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 45--57.
The Significance of Independence Results in Set Theory for Foundations. [REVIEW]John Cleave - 1970 - Ratio (Misc.) 12 (2):155.
Michael Dummett on Truth.Sadhan Chakraborti - 1993 - Indian Philosophical Quarterly 20 (1):1.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
8 (#1,335,087)

6 months
2 (#1,446,987)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Speaking with Shadows: A Study of Neo‐Logicism.Fraser MacBride - 2003 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (1):103-163.
Is Hume's principle analytic?Crispin Wright - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (1):307-333.
Is Hume's Principle Analytic?Crispin Wright - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (1):6-30.
Inclosures, Vagueness, and Self-Reference.Graham Priest - 2010 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (1):69-84.
The Paradox of Sufficient Reason.Samuel Levey - 2016 - Philosophical Review Recent Issues 125 (3):397-430.

View all 27 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references