Abstract

This article discusses the Tao Hu Hong idea, first described in the Tao Hu Hongzhe study the presentation of ideas, followed by the evaluation results of the study of contemporary Hong Hu pointed out that mainland scholars and study the concept of law and Mr. Mou's "heart of nature" model to teach circular interpretation of the absence of the former is not to clarify the difference between the system, which is a strong over-interpretation, so take this basic question of philosophy of law, for HU in the Cheng-jen, Mind, Road to discuss the concept of objects, the basic philosophy analysis of the problem proposition. Text to talk about HU by the Cheng-jen said the ontology and work on, talk about the concept of concentric concept and said things to say ontological, ontology work on. Overall, the HU study in ontology work on the accurate inheritance, the official said justified, but the lack of creativity. As there is a discussion on the theory, although related to, but not in depth, and does not form a system, leading to criticism of Zhu Xi. On Hu Hong 'doctrine of Tao / Qi , this paper first explains how the thought about Tao / Qi is expressed in Hu Hong's philosophy; secondly, we evaluate the cotemporary scholarship on Hu Hong, pointing out the defect of Mainland Chinese scholars' categorical approach along with the problem with Mou Tzung-san's interpretative model of perfect teaching-to manifest human nature through the cultivation of mind. The defect of those Mainland Chinese scholars is that they can't clarify the systematic differences, while Mou's problem is that he was too dominant in his interpretation. Therefore, this paper takes the methodology of fundamental philosophical questions and makes a propositional analysis of the fundamental philosophical questions of Hu Hong's concepts about cheng / ren, shin / shing and tao / wu. In this paper, we first talk about the theory of value and theory of practice of Hu Hong's doctrine of sincerity and kindness; and then we will discuss the theory of being, theory of value and theory of practice of Hu's doctrines of shin / shing and tao / wu. By and large, Hu Hong was precise and logical rather than creative in his theory of value and theory of practice. As for his theory of being, it's neither profound nor systematic, which in turn provoked Ju Xi's criticism