Chu Xi's Nature-principle Theory and His System of Principle Ontology-Arguments between Nature-Good and Nature without Good and Evil from Cheng Brothers, Hu Hong to Chu Xi

Philosophy and Culture 32 (7):7-24 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As a Confucian "complex" of the history of sports results, jurisprudence system around the grounds, gas, heart, and so built up of different core areas, nature-oriented way of thinking which play a pivotal role. Zhu Xi's starting point is two-way "sex is reason," said, but the theoretical framework and with the nature of the good ideas are inseparable. Zhu insisted not only that human nature is good, more is in the reasoning, so do its best to safeguard the human nature is good. As the antithesis of the theory, Zhu Xi Confucianism and Buddhism will be from each of the "inborn nature", "role", and "also a good vicious" and other ideas put together, that the various companies of the theory are "no reason "But the main spearhead is pointing to human nature is good for the Hunan sexuality," sighed the United States of speech, "said. Zhu Xi and Hu Hong sexuality debate, although the specific manifestations of the problem of whether the words good and evil, but in reality, how to identify areas in the jurisprudence of the status of the system, and thus leads to how to implement the body of heaven. Zhu Xi's theory of the HU and sub-divisions, the Yangtze, Sekishi, SU, Yang and other point of view, when put together, to the theory that he inherited his human nature is good and different from the previous Mencius each, and which eventually led to He established the system of jurisprudence. The systems of Neo-Confucianism was established encircling the basic categories of principle, material force, mind and nature, as a historical result of Confucian movement of restoration of nature. Among them it played a key role to think nature as the essence . The construction of Chu Xi's theory is based on the doctrines that nature is principle and nature is good. Chu Xi maintained the theory of nature-good trying his best and criticized the different opinions explaining natures such as what being inborn, function, likes and dislikes. Although the other whole doctrines about nature were unreasonable, Chu Xi aims mainly at the doctrine which nature-good is only the interjection praising nature from Hu Hong's nature-school. The debatable core between Chu Xi's principle-school and Hu Hong's nature- school focus on how nature and principle define their respective position in the system of Neo-Confucianism through whether nature can be defined in good and evil. Chu Xi succeeds to Mencius's theory of nature-good and excludes the other doctrines about nature, on which he founded his own system integrating nature and principle

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references