Semiotic Naturalism in Architecture Theory
Architecture Philosophy 2 (2) (2017)
AbstractThis paper seeks to present a kind of skeptical, and, in an indirect way, Wittgensteinian perspective upon purpose and meaning in architecture. The argument presented here revolves around the two notions that, first, there are different categories, which we have available for making architecture seem intelligible to us, and, second, that there are distinct historical discourses in which architecture has been made intelligible in specific ways.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Style-Architecture and Building-Art: Transformations of Architecture in the Nineteenth Century and its Present Condition.Hermann Muthesius - 1994 - Getty Publications.
The Architecture of the Jumping Universe a Polemic: How Complexity Science is Changing Architecture and Culture.Charles Jencks - 1995 - Academy Press.
Logiques Sociales Et Architecture: Actes du Séminaire, Ecole d'Architecture de Paris la Défense, 19 Mai 1995.Claude Bauhain - 1996
Monsters of Architecture: Anthropomorphism in Architectural Theory.Edward Winters & Marco Frascari - 1993 - Philosophical Quarterly 43 (171):251.
The Allure of Connectionism Reexamined.B. P. McLaughlin & T. A. Warfield - 1994 - Synthese 101 (3):365 - 400.
Architecture and Interpretation: Essays for Eric Fernie.Jill Franklin, T. A. Heslop & Christine Stevenson (eds.) - 2012 - Boydell Press.
Writing Spaces: Discourses of Architecture, Urbanism, and the Built Environment, 1960-2000.Christopher Greig Crysler - 2003 - Psychology Press.
Paradigms of Indian Architecture: Space and Time in Representation and Design.Giles Henry Rupert Tillotson - 1998 - Psychology Press.