Fantoli, Annibale. The Case of Galileo: A Closed Question? [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 65 (4):870-871 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

00346632

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,532

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

EI “caso galileo”, sin final previsible (the “Galileo's case”, no end in sight).Antonio Beltrán Marí - 2005 - Theoria 20 (2):125-141.
El “caso Galileo”, sin final previsible (The “Galileo's case”, no end in sight).Antonio Beltrán Marí - 2005 - Theoria 20 (2):125-141.
A strategy for assessing closure.Peter Murphy - 2006 - Erkenntnis 65 (3):365 - 383.
La Chiesa Cattolica e Galileo net XX secolo.Annibale Fantoli - 2007 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 63 (1/3):581 - 608.
Canonical forms for definable subsets of algebraically closed and real closed valued fields.Jan E. Holly - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (3):843-860.
Retrying Galileo. [REVIEW]Jude P. Dougherty - 2005 - Review of Metaphysics 59 (2):419-421.
Review of Maurice A. Finocchiaro: Defending Copernicus and Galileo: Critical Reasoning in the Two Affairs. [REVIEW]Peter Slezak - 2011 - Science & Education 20 (1):71-81.
Domingo de Soto and the Early Galileo. [REVIEW]Jude P. Dougherty - 2004 - Review of Metaphysics 57 (4):872-874.
Could There be Another Galileo Case?Gregory W. Dawes - 2002 - Journal of Religion and Society 4.
Galileo, rationality and explanation.Joseph C. Pitt - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (1):87-103.
The Paradox of Conceptual Novelty and Galileo’s Use of Experiments.Maarten Van Dyck - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):864-875.
The Galileo Case: Trial/Science/Truth. By Mario D'Addio The Church and Galileo. (Studies in Science and the Humanities from the Reilly Center for Science Technology and Values) Ed. by Ernan McMullin Galileo, Darwin, and Hawking: The Interplay of Science, Reason, and Religion. By Phil Dowe. [REVIEW]Jan Marten Ivo Klaver - 2008 - Heythrop Journal 49 (4):685–687.
The paradox of conceptual novelty and Galileo's use of experiments.Maarten Dycvank - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):864-875.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
32 (#495,641)

6 months
2 (#1,193,798)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references