Professional liability (malpractice) coverage of humanist scholars functioning as clinical medical ethicists

Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics 9 (2):101-110 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In contrast to theoretical discussions about potential professional liability of clinical ethicists, this report gives the results of empirical data gathered in a national survey of clinical medical ethicists. The report assesses the types of activities of clinical ethicists, the extent and types of their professional liability coverage, and the influence that concerns about legal liability has on how they function as clinical ethicists. In addition demographic data on age, sex, educational background, etc. are reported. The results show that while nearly one third (28.9%) of the ethicists regularly make recommendations about patient care, only 10.8% of them regularly make entries in the medical record; only approximately half (53.0%) of them are covered by professional liability (malpractice) insurance; and the vast majority (84.3%) of them say that concerns about legal liability do not influence the way they function as clinical ethicists

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why physicians should not do ethics consults.Frank H. Marsh - 1992 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 13 (3).
Case analysis in clinical ethics.Richard E. Ashcroft (ed.) - 2005 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
What is a clinical ethicist?Gregory T. Lyon-Loftus - 1986 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (1).
Complex ethics consultations: cases that haunt us.Paul J. Ford & Denise M. Dudzinski (eds.) - 2008 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-30

Downloads
37 (#430,758)

6 months
13 (#194,369)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?