Medicine Studies 3 (3):157-169 (2012)
AbstractPurposeThe aim of this paper is to assess the complex issue of responsibility in clinical practice. The paper focuses mainly on the relationship between personal- and medical-professional responsibility of practitioners and clinical guidelines.MethodsAfter a theoretical review of the different definitions of responsibility in selected bioethical and biojuridical literature, two recent juridical proceedings concerning medical responsibility from Italian Courts are discussed. Subsequently, a theoretical analysis of the definition of clinical practice guidelines is proposed in order to show their feasibility to assess personal- and medical-professional responsibility.ResultsThe definitions of responsibility and the two Italian cases show the theoretical and practical difficulties of shared assessments of both personal-professional and medical-professional responsibility in clinical practice. Clinical practice guidelines cannot be assumed as an objective code of action stating exactly a rule of conduct in all situations, but as a tool suggesting how to decide what to do in different conditions.ConclusionsResponsibility in clinical practice is such a complex issue to deserve a special ethical assessment. The clinician’s personal-professional responsibility cannot be replaced or reduced by clinical practice guidelines, because medicine is as such a relationship focused on the expertize of practitioners. Nonetheless, a shared approach to different clinical conditions is needed in order to avoid a relativist outcome and protect patients’ and even clinicians’ rights. Formal guidelines (that describe not exactly what to do but how to decide what to do) are proposed as potential useful tool to achieve this aim
Similar books and articles
Professional Liability (Malpractice) Coverage of Humanist Scholars Functioning as Clinical Medical Ethicists.Donnie J. Self & Joy D. Skeel - 1988 - Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics 9 (2):101-110.
MRC Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice in Clinical Trials.D. Vere - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (3):280-281.
The Sense of Responsibility in the Context of Professional Activities in Medical Genetics.Natália Oliva-Teles - 2011 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14 (4):397-405.
Limits on Patient Responsibility.Maureen Kelley - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (2):189 – 206.
The Infectious Diseases Society of America Lyme Guidelines: A Cautionary Tale About the Development of Clinical Practice Guidelines.Lorraine Johnson & Raphael B. Stricker - 2010 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 5:1-17.
Steps Towards a Theory of Medical Practice.Peter Hucklenbroich - 1998 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (3):215-228.
Ethical Issues in Outsourcing: The Case of Contract Medical Research and the Global Pharmaceutical Industry. [REVIEW]Henry Adobor - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 105 (2):239-255.
The Role of Professional Societies: Codes of Conduct and Their Enforcement.Stephanie J. Bird - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (3):315-320.
Clinical Reasoning: New Challenges.William E. Stempsey - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (3):173-179.
Clinical Ethics: Theory or Practice?Jos V. M. Welie - 1998 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (3):295-312.
Physicians Must Honor Refusal of Treatment to Restore Competency by Non-Dangerous Inmates on Death Row.Howard Zonana - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (4):764-773.
Responsibility After the Apparent End: 'Following-Up' in Clinical Ethics Consultation.Stuart G. Finder & Mark J. Bliton - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (7):413-424.
Reexamination of the Ethics of Placebo Use in Clinical Practice.Atsushi Asai & Yasuhiro Kadooka - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (4):186-193.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
On the Relevance of Neuroscience to Criminal Responsibility.Nicole A. Vincent - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):77-98.