What linguists can and can't tell you about the human mind: A reply to Croft

Cognitive Linguistics 9 (4):361-378 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to Haiman and Croft.Martin Haspelmath - 2008 - Cognitive Linguistics 19 (1).
In reply [reply to commentaries on "how to solve the mind-body problem"].Nicholas Humphrey - 2000 - Humphrey, Nicholas (2000) in Reply [Reply to Commentaries on "How to Solve the Mind-Body Problem"]. [Journal (Paginated)] 7 (4):98-112.
The problem of mind in Confucianism.Xunwu Chen - 2016 - Asian Philosophy 26 (2):166-181.
Revisited Linguistic Intuitions.Jennifer Culbertson & Steven Gross - 2011 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (3):639 - 656.
“Grammar box” in the brain.Valéria Csépe - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):672-673.
Spinoza on the Eternity of the Human Mind.Frank Lucash - 1990 - Philosophy and Theology 5 (2):103-113.
Are linguists better subjects?Jennifer Culbertson & Steven Gross - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (4):721-736.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
17 (#862,403)

6 months
3 (#967,057)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references