Cross-domain thinking: Common representation format or generalized mapping process?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):683-684 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Carruthers’ formulation, cross-domain thinking requires translation of domain specific data into a common format, and linguistic LF thus plays the role of the common medium of exchange. Alternatively, I propose a process-oriented characterization, in which there is no common representation and cross-domain thinking is rather the process of establishing mappings across domains, as in the process of analogical reasoning.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Developing dual-representation processes.Katherine Nelson - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):693-694.
What domain integration could not be.Philip Robbins - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):696-697.
Language, consciousness, and cross-modular thought.Keith Frankish - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):685-686.
Distinctively human thinking.Peter Carruthers - 1998 - In Peter Carruthers & Jill Boucher (eds.), Language and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 69.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
40 (#396,692)

6 months
1 (#1,464,097)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references