An extension of the Łukasiewicz logic to the modal logic of quantum mechanics

Studia Logica 37 (2):149-155 (1978)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An attempt is made to include the axioms of Mackey for probabilities of experiments in quantum mechanics into the calculus x0 of ukasiewicz. The obtained calculusQ contains an additional modal signQ and four modal rules of inference. The propositionQx is read x is confirmed. The most specific rule of inference may be read: for comparable observations implication is equivalent to confirmation of material implication.The semantic truth ofQ is established by the interpretation with the help of physical objects obeying to the rules of quantum mechanics. The embedding of the usual quantum propositional logic inQ is accomplished.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Are the Laws of Quantum Logic Laws of Nature?Peter Mittelstaedt - 2012 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (2):215-222.
Non-commutative Łukasiewicz propositional logic.Ioana Leuştean - 2006 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 45 (2):191-213.
On Axiomatization of Łukasiewicz's Four-Valued Modal Logic.Marcin Tkaczyk - 2011 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 20 (3):215-232.
Bourne on future contingents and three-valued logic.Daisuke Kachi - 2009 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 18 (1):33-43.
Extended quantum logic.Kenji Tokuo - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (5):549-563.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
44 (#355,844)

6 months
7 (#417,309)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Three prepositional calculi of probability.Herman Dishkant - 1980 - Studia Logica 39 (1):49 - 61.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On the structure of quantum logic.P. D. Finch - 1969 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 34 (2):275-282.

Add more references