Autonomy trumps all?: A kantian critique of physician-assisted death

The Australasian Catholic Record 94 (4):466 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dinh, Hoa Trung At the forefront of the current debate on 'assisted death' is the autonomy argument. Advocates of assisted death often appeal to respect for autonomy as a trump card that can override all other considerations: the value of human life, the prohibition of killing in the medical tradition, and other social responsibilities. For Kant, who invented the concept of autonomy and regarded it as the manifestation of human dignity, the concept of killing oneself is rationally indefensible and totally at odds with the exercise of autonomy. This article discusses the origin of respect for autonomy in health ethics, and provides a Kantian critique of physician-assisted death.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Autonomy, voluntariness and assisted dying.Ben Colburn - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (5):316-319.
Autonomy, Oppression, and "Choice" in Euthanasia.Eileen Margaret Ambrosio - 1994 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
The Dialectic of Autonomy and Beneficence in the Standard Argument for ‘Death with Dignity'.Bell Jeremy Raymond - 2016 - Solidarity: The Journal of Catholic Social Thought and Secular Ethics 6 (1):Article 3.
Altruism and Physician Assisted Death.M. Gunderson & D. J. Mayo - 1993 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (3):281-295.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-13

Downloads
23 (#672,256)

6 months
1 (#1,722,767)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references