La función ideológica del transhumanismo y algunos de sus presupuestos

Isegoría 63:367-386 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We must undoubtedly take advantage of the benefits brought by new technologies, and we must apply them to the human being to the extent that a prolonged and serene reflection tells us that this application brings improvements in a full sense. But that does not mean that we should accept the ideological discourse of transhumanism. This discourse owes much of its power of conviction to certain philosophical assumptions that have not been sufficiently clarified and discussed. This article aims to highlight some of them.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ideología y análisis del discurso.Teun A. Van Dijk - 2005 - Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana 10 (29):9-36.
Burbury's Last Case: The Mystery of the Entropic Arrow.Huw Price - 2002 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 50:19-56.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-10-27

Downloads
14 (#1,020,370)

6 months
1 (#1,516,603)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Science in a Democratic Society.Philip Kitcher - 2011 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 101:95-112.
In defense of posthuman dignity.Nick Bostrom - 2005 - Bioethics 19 (3):202–214.
Gene Editing, the Mystic Threat to Human Dignity.Vera Lúcia Raposo - 2019 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 16 (2):249-257.

View all 7 references / Add more references