Semantic Epistemology: Response to Machery

Theoria 27 (2):229-233 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Machery argues: that “philosophers’ intuitions about reference are not more reliable than lay people’s —if anything, they are probably worse”; that “intuitions about the reference of proper names and uses of proper names provide equally good evidence for theories of reference”. lacks theoretical and empirical support. cannot be right because usage provides the evidence that intuitions are reliable.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Semantic Epistemology.Michael Devitt - 2012 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 27 (2):229-233.
Counteractuals, Counterfactuals and Semantic Intuitions.Jesper Kallestrup - 2016 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 7 (1):35-54.
The 'Gödel' effect.Gary Ostertag - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (1):65-82.
Against Arguments from Reference.Ron Mallon, Edouard Machery, Shaun Nichols & Stephen Stich - 2009 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (2):332 - 356.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-06-27

Downloads
134 (#137,343)

6 months
10 (#268,644)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Devitt
CUNY Graduate Center

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references