Non-conceptual content or Singular Concept?

Kaant Studien Online 1:210-239 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is a new non-descriptivist defense of nonconceptualism based on a new interpretation of Kant’s metaphysics of concepts. We advance the following claim: What distinguishes non-conceptual from conceptual singular representations is the way partial representations of the object’s features are integrated into the whole representation of the object, while at the non-conceptual level, this integration takes the form of images of the object’s features that are stored and projected, at the conceptual level this integration takes the form of the recognition that those features are properties of a same object, what Kant calls “synthetic unity of Aperception”

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Intuition and Judgment: How Not to Think about the Singularity of Intuition.Thomas Land - 2013 - In Stefano Bacin, Alfredo Ferrarin, Claudio La Rocca & Margit Ruffing (eds.), Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht. Akten des XI. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Boston: de Gruyter. pp. vol. 2, 221-231.
Intuition and Immediacy in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason.Andrew Kelley - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Research 22:289-298.
Intuition and Immediacy in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason.Andrew Kelley - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Research 22:289-298.
Complex demonstratives and their singular contents.David Braun - 2008 - Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (1):57-99.
Trading on Identity and Singular Thought.Rachel Goodman - 2022 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 100 (2):296-312.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-11-16

Downloads
62 (#257,975)

6 months
62 (#75,864)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Roberto Horácio De Pereira
Federal University of Rio de Janeiro

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Varieties of Reference.Gareth Evans - 1982 - Oxford: Oxford University Press. Edited by John Henry McDowell.
Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong.Jerry A. Fodor - 1998 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Reference and definite descriptions.Keith S. Donnellan - 1966 - Philosophical Review 75 (3):281-304.
Thought and reference.Kent Bach - 1987 - New York: Clarendon Press.
Mind and World.John Mcdowell - 1996 - Philosophical Quarterly 46 (182):99-109.

View all 11 references / Add more references