On Moving Past the ABCs

Metaphysica 24 (2):445-454 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Craig Callender’s What Makes Time Special? (OUP 2017) advocates and practices an innovative, thoroughly interdisciplinary approach to philosophical questions about time and temporal features of our lives. Grappling with it is of intrinsic philosophical interest; it is also part of responding to the methodological invitation the book issues to philosophers of time. This paper is motivated by the wish to clarify WMTS’s philosophical underpinnings. The main claim of the paper is that WMTS relies on an ambiguity between rejecting the A-theory versus B-theory debate, and endorsing a position within that debate. This ambiguity leads to a somewhat unstable position on how a key feature of manifest time, namely our sense of time as flowing, arises from physical time. The paper ends with a suggestion for how to resolve the ambiguity, in a way that is in line with the gist of Callender’s overall vision for the field.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Brief Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science.Peter Machamer - 2002 - In Peter Machamer & Michael Silberstein (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 1–17.
The rise of logical empiricist philosophy of science and the fate of speculative philosophy of science.Joel Katzav & Krist Vaesen - 2022 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 12 (2):000-000.
Reconsidering Logical Positivism.Michael Friedman - 1999 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
On some methodological problems of psychology.Gustav Bergmann - 1940 - Philosophy of Science 7 (April):205-219.
Quantum Mechanics.Richard Healey - 2017 - In W. H. Newton‐Smith (ed.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Science. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 376–384.
Reconsidering Logical Positivism. [REVIEW]Eric D. Hetherington - 2000 - Review of Metaphysics 54 (2):428-430.
The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism.Alan Richardson & Thomas Uebel (eds.) - 2007 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Realistic Claims in Logical Empiricism.Matthias Neuber - forthcoming - In Uskali Mäki, Stéphanie Ruphy, Gerhard Schurz & Ioannis Votsis (eds.), Recent Developments in the Philosophy of Science: EPSA13 Helsinki. Springer.
Demystifying the Influential IS Legends of Positivism.Mikko Siponen & Aggeliki Tsohou - 2018 - Journal of the Association for Information Systems 19 (7):600-617.
Ludwig Wittgenstein and Logical Positivism.Alexander L. Nikiforov - 2021 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 58 (1):22-30.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-26

Downloads
31 (#508,918)

6 months
14 (#172,725)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Natalja Deng
Yonsei University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Presentism, eternalism, and the growing block.Kristie Miller - 2013 - In Heather Dyke & Adrian Bardon (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Time. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 345-364.
Relativity, the Open Future, and the Passage of Time.Oliver Pooley - 2013 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 113 (3pt3):321-363.
Robust versus anemic: comments on Objective Becoming.Tim Maudlin - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (7):1807-1814.
Of Time and the Two Images.Steven F. Savitt - 2012 - Humana Mente 5 (21).

Add more references