How best to protect the vital interests of donor-conceived individuals: prohibiting or mandating anonymity in gamete donations?

Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online:100-108 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Anonymous gamete donation continues to be practised in most jurisdictions around the world, but this practice has come under increased scrutiny. Thus, several countries now mandate that donors be identifiable to their genetic offspring. Critics contend that anonymous gamete donation harms the interests of donor-conceived individuals and that protection of these interests calls for legal prohibition of anonymous donations. Among the vital interests that critics claim are thwarted by anonymous donation are an interest in having a strong family relationship, health interests, and an interest in forming a healthy identity. This article discusses each of these interests and examines what they could involve. The legislation in two countries is considered: Spain, which mandates anonymous gamete donation, and the UK, which prohibits such practice, to assess how these different legislations might or might not protect these vital interests.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,070

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Should Mitochondrial Donation Be Anonymous?John B. Appleby - 2018 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 43 (2):261-280.
Personal Identity as a Form of Freedom.Marta Spranzi & Laurence Brunet - 2014 - Hastings Center Report 44 (5):3-4.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-01

Downloads
25 (#622,666)

6 months
8 (#505,344)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Inmaculada de Melo-Martin
Weill Cornell Medicine--Cornell University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references