University of Missouri (2007)
AbstractThe U.S. Constitution provides a framework for our laws, but what does it have to say about morality? Paul DeHart ferrets out that document’s implicit moral assumptions as he revisits the notion that constitutions are more than merely practical institutional arrangements. In _Uncovering the Constitution’s Moral Design_, he seeks to reveal, elaborate, and then evaluate the Constitution’s normative framework to determine whether it is philosophically sound—and whether it makes moral assumptions that correspond to reality. Rejecting the standard approach of the intellectual historian, DeHart for the first time in constitutional theory applies the method of inference to the best explanation to ascertaining our Constitution’s moral meaning. He distinguishes the Constitution’s intention from the subjective intentions of the framers, teasing out presuppositions that the document makes about the nature of sovereignty, the common good, natural law, and natural rights. He then argues that the Constitution constrains popular sovereignty in a way that entails a real common good, transcendent of human willing and promotive of human well-being, but he points out that while the Constitution presupposes a real common good, it also implies a natural law that prescribes the common good. In critiquing previous attempts at describing and evaluating the Constitution’s normative framework, DeHart demonstrates that the Constitution’s moral framework corresponds largely to classical moral theory. He challenges the logical coherency of modern moral philosophy, normative positivism, and other theories that the Constitution has been argued to embody and offers a groundbreaking methodology that can be applied to uncovering the normative framework of other constitutions as well. This cogently argued study shows that the Constitution presupposes a natural law to which human law must conform, and it takes a major step in resolving current debates over the Constitution’s normative framework while remaining detached from the social issues that divide today’s political arena. _Uncovering the Constitution’s Moral Design_ is an original approach to the Constitution that marks a significant contribution to understanding the moral underpinnings of our form of government
Similar books and articles
Against Originalism: Getting Over the U. S. Constitution.Austin W. Bramwell - 2004 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 16 (4):431-453.
Gegenstandskonstitution und Seinsentwurf als Verzeitigung. Über die zeitliche Konstitution der Gegenstandstypen bei Husserl und den zeitlichen Entwürf der Seinsarten bei Heidegger.Siegfried Rombach - 2004 - Husserl Studies 20 (1):25-41.
Politics and Ethics of the Indian Constitution.Rajeev Bhargava (ed.) - 2009 - Oxford University Press India.
The Design of Material, Organism, and Minds: Different Understandings of Design.Michael Hampe & Silke Lang (eds.) - 2009 - Springer.
What Values in Design? The Challenge of Incorporating Moral Values Into Design.Noëmi Manders-Huits - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (2):271-287.
Some Aspects of the Interpretation of the Constitution: the Possibility and Limits of Valuable (Moral) Arguments.Gediminas Mesonis - 2009 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 116 (2):45-59.
The Liberal Constitution: Rational Design or Evolution?Norman P. Barry - 1989 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 3 (2):267-282.
Why Research-Oriented Design Isn’T Design-Oriented Research: On the Tensions Between Design and Research in an Implicit Design Discipline.Daniel Fallman - 2007 - Knowledge, Technology & Policy 20 (3):193-200.
Understanding Moral Responsibility in the Design of Trailers.Simone van der Burg & Anke van Gorp - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (2):235-256.
The Significance of Signatures: Why the Framers Signed the Constitution and What They Meant by Doing So.Michael Coenen - unknown
Function and Self-Constitution: How to Make Something of Yourself Without Being All That You Can Be. A Commentary on Christine Korsgaard's The Constitution of Agency and Self-Constitution.A. Barandalla & M. Ridge - 2011 - Analysis 71 (2):364-380.
Understanding Moral Responsibility in the Design of Trailers.Simone Burg & Anke Gorp - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (2):235-256.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Citations of this work
Leviathan Leashed: The Incoherence of Absolute Sovereign Power.Paul R. DeHart - 2013 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 25 (1):1-37.
References found in this work
No references found.