The significance of the argument from design

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 27:359 (1927)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/aristotelian/27.1.359

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Significance of the Argument from Design.W. G. De Burgh - 1927 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 27:359 - 384.
Paley’s Argument for Design.Graham Oppy - 2002 - Philo 5 (2):161-173.
The Laws of Physics and the Design of the Universe.Stephen M. Barr - 2010 - In Melville Y. Stewart (ed.), Science and Religion in Dialogue. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 893--910.
Ragioni scientifiche e ragioni teologiche nell'Argument from Design: il caso di Berkeley.Daniele Bertini - 2011 - Lo Sguardo 6 (2).
By design: James Clerk Maxwell and the evangelical unification of science.Matthew Stanley - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Science 45 (1):57-73.
Anthropocentrism and the design argument.Neil A. Manson - 2000 - Religious Studies 36 (2):163-176.
The argument from apparent design.Clement Dore - 2014 - Think 13 (37):85-94.
Paley's Teleological Argument and Its Significance.Bill Spencer - 2006 - Dialogue: Journal of Phi Sigma Tau 48 (2-3):62 - 65.
Modern cosmology - a cognitive approach God?Winfried Loffler - 2009 - Philosophy and Culture 36 (8):157-171.
The weak anthropic principle and the design argument.Joseph M. Zycinski - 1996 - Zygon 31 (1):115-130.
Anthropic reasoning and the contemporary design argument in astrophysics: A reply to Robert Klee.Mark Walker & Milan M. Cirkovic - unknown
Towards a religious philosophy.William George De Burgh - 1937 - London,: Macdonald & Evans.
Structural flaws: Massive modularity and the argument from design.Armin Schulz - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (4):733-743.
The argument for design.R. G. Swinburne - 1984 - In J. Houston (ed.), Is it reasonable to believe in God? Edinburgh: Handsel Press. pp. 199-.
Answering the biochemical argument from design.Kenneth R. Miller - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science. Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
22 (#707,407)

6 months
1 (#1,467,486)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references