The significance of the argument from design
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 27:359 (1927)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)DOI
10.1093/aristotelian/27.1.359
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Significance of the Argument from Design.W. G. De Burgh - 1927 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 27:359 - 384.
The Laws of Physics and the Design of the Universe.Stephen M. Barr - 2010 - In Science and Religion in Dialogue. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 893--910.
Ragioni scientifiche e ragioni teologiche nell'Argument from Design: il caso di Berkeley.Daniele Bertini - 2011 - Lo Sguardo 6 (2).
By design: James Clerk Maxwell and the evangelical unification of science.Matthew Stanley - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Science 45 (1):57-73.
Paley's Teleological Argument and Its Significance.Bill Spencer - 2006 - Dialogue: Journal of Phi Sigma Tau 48 (2-3):62 - 65.
Modern cosmology - a cognitive approach God?Winfried Loffler - 2009 - Philosophy and Culture 36 (8):157-171.
The weak anthropic principle and the design argument.Joseph M. Zycinski - 1996 - Zygon 31 (1):115-130.
Anthropic reasoning and the contemporary design argument in astrophysics: A reply to Robert Klee.Mark Walker & Milan M. Cirkovic - unknown
Structural flaws: Massive modularity and the argument from design.Armin Schulz - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (4):733-743.
The argument for design.R. G. Swinburne - 1984 - In J. Houston (ed.), Philosophy. Handsel Press. pp. 199-.
Answering the biochemical argument from design.Kenneth R. Miller - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science. Routledge.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-02-02
Downloads
20 (#566,383)
6 months
1 (#455,463)
2015-02-02
Downloads
20 (#566,383)
6 months
1 (#455,463)
Historical graph of downloads
