Does the No Alternatives Argument Need Gerrymandering to Be Signifi cant?

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 717081:ja (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a recent paper, Tushar Menon has argued that the no-alternatives argument can only be signifi cant if the priors for numbers of alternatives are tuned in an implausible way (gerrymandered, as he calls it). In this paper, I demonstrate that priors needed for making a no-alternatives argument signi ficant are in line with what can be plausibly assumed in a successful research fi eld.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-07

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard Dawid
Stockholm University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references