Some remarks on the foundations of quantum theory

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (3):521-539 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although many physicists have little interest in philosophical arguments about their subject, an analysis of debates about the paradoxes of quantum mechanics shows that their disagreements often depend upon assumptions about the relationship between theories and the real world. Some consider that physics is about building mathematical models which necessarily have limited domains of applicability, while others are searching for a final theory of everything, to which their favourite theory is supposed to be an approximation. We discuss some particular recent debates about quantum theory in which the underlying assumptions are not fully articulated. Introduction Setting the scene The Ghirardi, Rimini and Weber theory Quantum marbles Radioactive decay and isomerism The limits of quantum theory.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
108 (#162,562)

6 months
23 (#118,888)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Emily Davies
University of Birmingham

Citations of this work

Newton da Costa e a Filosofia de Quase-verdade.Décio Krause - 2009 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 13 (2):105-128.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science.Nancy Cartwright - 1999 - New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Critical Notices.Nancy Cartwright - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (1):244-249.

View all 27 references / Add more references