Reaction and Reflection in Tetris

First Annual International Conference on AI Planning Systems (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

To discover how to couple reflection with reaction we have been studying how people play the computer game Tetris. Our basic intuition is that the job of the reasoned is to monitor the environment and the agent’s behavior over time to discover trends or deviations from the agent’s normative policy and tune the priorities of the Attentional system accordingly.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Some Epistemic Benefits of Action-Tetris, a Case Study.David Kirsh & P. Maglio - 1992 - Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
Autonomy and false beliefs.Suzy Killmister - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 164 (2):513-531.
Tetris.Robert Harries - 2009 - Philosophy Now 75:13-14.
The idealistic reaction against science.Antonio Aliotta - 1914 - New York: Arno Press. Edited by Agnes McCaskill.
Perceptive Actions in Tetris.David Kirsh & Paul Maglio - 1992 - Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium.
Distorted reflection.Rachael Briggs - 2009 - Philosophical Review 118 (1):59-85.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-02-20

Downloads
453 (#42,412)

6 months
69 (#69,621)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Kirsh
University of California, San Diego

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references