Philosophical Studies 164 (2):513-531 (2013)

Suzy Killmister
Monash University
The majority of current attention on the question of autonomy has focused on the internal reflection of the agent. The quality of an agent’s reflection on her potential action (or motivating desire or value) is taken to determine whether or not that action is autonomous. In this paper, I argue that there is something missing in most of these contemporary accounts of autonomy. By focusing overwhelmingly on the way in which the agent reflects, such accounts overlook the importance of what the agent is reflecting upon. Whichever of these current formulations of autonomy we accept, reflection could be undertaken in full accordance with the conditions set, and yet the action fail to be autonomous. This will occur, I argue, if the agent is mistaken about the object of her reflection. More precisely, if she has a particular kind of false belief about the action she is contemplating undertaking, then no amount of reflection can render that action autonomous. This suggests the need for externalist conditions to be incorporated into an account of autonomy
Keywords Autonomy  False beliefs  Action  Mele  McKenna
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-012-9864-0
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,163
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person.Harry Frankfurt - 1971 - Journal of Philosophy 68 (1):5-20.
Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility.Harry Frankfurt - 1969 - Journal of Philosophy 66 (23):829.
The Theory and Practice of Autonomy.Gerald Dworkin - 1988 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 32 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Autonomy, Rationality, and Contemporary Bioethics.Jonathan Pugh - 2020 - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Ravines and Sugar Pills: Defending Deceptive Placebo Use.Jonathan Pugh - 2015 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 40 (1):83-101.
The Trouble with Formal Views of Autonomy.Jonathan Knutzen - 2020 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 18 (2).

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Endorsement and Autonomous Agency.François Schroeter - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (3):633 - 659.
Autonomous Action and Autonomy-Subverting Psychiatric Conditions.David DeGrazia - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (3):279-297.
Autonomy Within Subservient Careers.James Rocha - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (3):313-328.
Agency, Autonomy, and Social Intelligibility.William Hasselberger - 2012 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (2):255-278.
Believing Autonomously.Mark Leon - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 9:169-183.
Critical Reflection, Self-Knowledge, and the Emotions.Catriona Mackenzie - 2002 - Philosophical Explorations 5 (3):186-206.
Representing the Agent Through Second-Order States.David A. Jensen - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology 26 (1):69 - 88.


Added to PP index

Total views
135 ( #86,587 of 2,507,015 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,781 of 2,507,015 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes