Berkeley and Phenomenalism

Dialogue 1 (1):67-80 (1962)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

My reason for bringing up the familiar matter of phenomenalism is both critical and historical. Almost to a man those who have been interested in arguing for or against phenomenalism have assumed that Berkeley was a phenomenalist. Now if Berkeley's doctrine is appropriately named “phenomenalism,” then it is a phenomenalism of a quite different stripe from the twentieth century variety, though many who have described his doctrine as phenomenalism have not sufficiently stressed the difference.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,405

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Phenomenalism.William Braxton Irvine - 1980 - Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles
Berkeley and Leibniz.Stephen Puryear - 2021 - In Samuel Charles Rickless (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Berkeley. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 503-521.
Phenomenalism and Kant.Roberto Horacio de Sá Pereira - 2021 - Con-Textos Kantianos 1 (13):245-258.
A Study in Phenomenalism.James Giles - 1994 - Aalborg University.
Functionalism and phenomenalism: A critical note.Colin McGinn - 1980 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 58 (1):35-46.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-25

Downloads
91 (#195,170)

6 months
25 (#140,974)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Mullā ṣadrā on the problem of natural universals.Muhammad U. Faruque - 2017 - Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 27 (2):269-302.
Berkeley's Ontology and the Epistemology of Idealism.Robert Muehlmann - 1978 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 8 (1):89-111.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references