The Influence of Scientific Criticism and Self-Criticism on the Forming of the New Human Being

Russian Studies in Philosophy 15 (1):71-72 (1976)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Under the conditions of the revolution in science and technology, of tremendous social changes, of the tempestuous and significant growth in the prestige of scientific knowledge, and of the exacerbation of the ideological struggle, there has been an immeasurable broadening of the social tasks and spheres of operation of such social phenomena as scientific criticism and self-criticism. Study of social, theoretical, and psychological cross-sections of these phenomena is one of the necessary conditions for cultivating lofty civic qualities, a communist world-view, and the moral and aesthetic improvement of the individual. Special attention is directed to the socializing function of criticism and self-criticism in the Program of the CPSU, the materials of the Twenty-fourth Congress of the CPSU, and the resolutions of the Central Committee of the CPSU "On Literary and Artistic Criticism" and "On the State of Criticism and Self-Criticism in the Tambov Regional Party Organization." Scientific criticism reveals the extent to which the results or processes of practical activity are in accord with communist ideals and to what degree the moral and aesthetic norms of individuals and collectives are an expression of proletarian and general human culture. This is a distinctive intellectual and theoretical form of solution of social contradictions. Criticism is organically interwoven into theoretical and practical human activity. It breaks down old and established social traditions and customary values and impels human thought to undertake scientific quests. It does not permit society to content itself merely with its past triumphs. Scientific criticism arouses and cultivates class consciousness and provides an evaluation of social phenomena from the standpoint of the progressive class. Under the conditions of developed socialist society, criticism and self-criticism become an active means for improving ideological, political, and educational work, the development of the toilers' creative capacities, and activation of the sociopolitical and intellectual life of society

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Editorial Foreword.[author unknown] - 1973 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 11 (4):315-318.
Editorial Foreword.Peter S. Groff - 2004 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 28 (1):1-2.
Editorial Foreword.Paul S. Loeb - 2006 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 30 (1):1-2.
Editorial Foreword.Leslie Stevenson - 1986 - Philosophical Quarterly 36 (143):109.
Editorial Foreword.Frederick G. Weiss - 1969 - The Owl of Minerva 1 (1):1-1.
Editorial Foreword.Andrew Hamilton - 1984 - Philosophical Quarterly 34 (136):183.
Editorial foreword.Bertrand Munier - 1993 - Theory and Decision 35 (3):203-205.
Editorial Foreword.David Owen - 2003 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 26 (1):94-96.
Editorial foreword.Everett Mendelsohn - 1968 - Journal of the History of Biology 1 (1):1-2.
Editorial foreword.Katrin Flikschuh & Jens Timmermann - 2007 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (2):151-153.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-11

Downloads
14 (#994,650)

6 months
1 (#1,722,767)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references