Berkeley's Rejection of Divine Analogy

Science Et Esprit 63 (2):149-161 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Berkeley argues that claims about divine predication (e.g., God is wise or exists) should be understood literally rather than analogically, because like all spirits (i.e., causes), God is intelligible only in terms of the extent of his effects. By focusing on the harmony and order of nature, Berkeley thus unites his view of God with his doctrines of mind, force, grace, and power, and avoids challenges to religious claims that are raised by appeals to analogy. The essay concludes by showing how a letter, supposedly by Berkeley, to Peter Browne ("discovered" in 1969 by Berman and Pittion) is, in fact, by John Jackson (1686-1763), controversial theologian and friend of Samuel Clarke.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-20

Downloads
556 (#43,416)

6 months
111 (#49,221)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen H. Daniel
Texas A&M University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references