The Relationship of Russell and Quine to Contemporary Theorists on Reference

Dissertation, Syracuse University (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The major thesis of this Dissertation is that "causal" and "historical explanation" theories are fundamentally similar to Russell's about proper names and definite descriptions, and the main antagonist of the recent theorists is Quine, not Russell. These recent theorists include Kripke

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reference and descriptions.Andrea Bianchi - 2011 - In Marina Sbisà, Jan-Ola Ostman & Jef Verschueren (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives for Pragmatics. Amsterdam: pp. 253-279.
Russell was right (almost).Kent Bach - 1983 - Synthese 54 (2):189 - 207.
Public Proper Names, Idiolectal Identifying Descriptions.Stavroula Glezakos - 2009 - Linguistics and Philosophy 32 (3):317-326.
Names as Disguised Descriptions.Mark John D'cruz - 1998 - Dissertation, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick
Completing Russell’s Logic.Hartley Slater - 2007 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 27 (1).
Kripke on proper names.Baruch A. Brody - 1979 - In A. French Peter, E. Uehling Theodore, Howard Jr & K. Wettstein (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language. University of Minnesota Press. pp. 64-69.
Definite descriptions and negative existential quantifiers.Paul Elbourne - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (7):1597-1612.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references