Preconception Gender Selection: A Threat to the Natural Sex Ratio?

Reproductive Biomedicine Online 10 (1):116-118 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This brief paper summarizes a series of postal investigations on the acceptance of selection for X or Y spermatozoa. These were conducted mainly in Germany but also in the UK, the Netherlands and the US. Selected families were approached with a series of questions about their wish to use sperm selection, and their choice of boys or girls. In general, large majorities opposed this approach for family balancing or sex selection on the basis of cost and inconvenience of the treatment. The view was expressed that its use in medicine was more acceptable. Care was taken to compose a series of open questions to particular sections of the population, e.g.men versus women, differing ages, and families with imbalanced sex ratios. More favourable responses arose, for example in pregnant women. Overall, all four nations had large majorities against the use of sex selection.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-04-10

Downloads
1,340 (#700)

6 months
148 (#126,361)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Edgar Dahl
Universität Giessen

References found in this work

Gendercide: The Implications of Sex Selection.Mary Anne Warren - 1985 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Preconception gender selection.John A. Robertson - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (1):2 – 9.
Can sex selection be ethically tolerated?B. M. Dickens - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (6):335-336.
Why sex selection should be legal.David McCarthy - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (5):302-307.
Sex Selection: Laissez Faire or Family Balancing?Edgar Dahl - 2005 - Health Care Analysis 13 (1):87-90.

View all 14 references / Add more references