The Banality of Narcissism: The Freudian Insight of Hannah Arendt

Arendt Studies 7:165-185 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, I point Arendtian scholarship to important elements in the history of psychoanalysis that are relevant to explain Hannah Arendt’s known aversion to the discipline. I show how the political theorist relied on psychoanalytically-relevant concepts from her intellectual heritage—from Aristotle and St. Augustine to Hegel and Nietzsche. Afterward, I argue that Hannah Arendt’s critique of Adolf Eichmann was simultaneously a critique of his narcissism, or lack thereof. I show how her critique was truer to Freud’s original understanding of the concept than that of psychoanalysts writing in postwar America; a time in which the term narcissism itself became misused. I finally marry Freudian and Arendtian concepts together to think about the banality of narcissism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is radical evil banal? Is banal evil radical?Paul Formosa - 2007 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (6):717-735.
Den banala debatten: Hanna Arendt i Jerusalem.Svante Lundgren - 2001 - Nordisk judaistik/Scandinavian Jewish Studies 22 (2):131-156.
Hannah Arendt's ethics.Deirdre Lauren Mahony - 2018 - New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Hannah Arendt.Richard P. Nielsen - 2014 - In Jenny Helin, Tor Hernes, Daniel Hjorth & Robin Holt (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Process Philosophy and Organization Studies. Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-20

Downloads
21 (#729,174)

6 months
10 (#382,663)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references