Den banala debatten: Hanna Arendt i Jerusalem

Nordisk judaistik/Scandinavian Jewish Studies 22 (2):131-156 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Few books within the field of Jewish studies have caused so much anger and intense debate as Hannah Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem. A Report on the Banality of Evil. The author was considered to be a self-hating Jew because she accused the Jewish leaders during the Holocaust for having complied with Nazi orders and thus having facilitated the mass murder. Her view of the personality of Eichmann was considered to be wrong, and her way of writing was seen as inappropriate in its lack of humility in dealing with an issue like the Holocaust. Although much of the critique was unfair, Arendt’s non-diplomatic style of writing contributed to the negative reactions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Anti-Holocaustlitteraturen og dens baggrund.Ragnar Kvam - 1982 - Nordisk judaistik/Scandinavian Jewish Studies 4 (1):11-14.
The Banality of Evil and the Meaning of Punishment.Klaas Rozemond - 2016 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 78 (4):863-889.
Hannah Arendt's Political Thought.David Antonini - 2018 - 1000-Word Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology.
Jewish to the core.Suzanne Vromen - 2010 - In Roger Berkowitz (ed.), Thinking in Dark Times: Hannah Arendt on Ethics and Politics. New York: Fordham University Press.
Representing the unrepresentable: Victor Klemperer's Holocaust diaries.Jerry Schuchalter - 1998 - Nordisk judaistik/Scandinavian Jewish Studies 19 (1-2):7-32.
Hannah Arendt’s Jewish Identity.Suzanne Vromen - 2004 - European Journal of Political Theory 3 (2):177-190.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-31

Downloads
8 (#1,309,160)

6 months
5 (#626,991)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?