Amgen v. Sanofi: The U.S. Supreme Court Reviews Patent Enablement

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 51 (3):689-693 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

On June 18, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court in the matter of Amgen, Inc. et al. v. Sanofi, et al.1 unanimously upheld the 2021 decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit,2 striking down as overbroad Amgen’s patent claim to an entire functional genus of monoclonal antibodies. Amgen’s patent claims were not limited to antibody structure or antibody amino acid sequences. This is significant because Amgen’s patent claims did have amino acid sequences, but they were directed to the epitope.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Patents and ethics: Is it possible to be balanced?Jacek Spławiński - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (1):71-74.
The mathematics of patent claim analysis.Zsófia Kacsuk - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 19 (4):263-289.
Patent rights or patent wrongs? The case of patent rights on AIDS drugs.Paul Davey Samantha Byrne - 2006 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 15 (3):299-305.
Semiotic Aspects in Patent Interpretation.Simone R. N. Reis, Andre Reis, Jordi Carrabina & Pompeu Casanovas - 2019 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 32 (2):359-389.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-14

Downloads
7 (#1,382,106)

6 months
7 (#420,337)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references