Skepticism About the “Convertibility” of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

American Journal of Bioethics 13 (1):40-42 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No abstract available. First paragraph: In this issue’s target article, Stier and Schoene-Siefert purport to ‘depotentialize’ the argument from potentiality based on their claim that any human cell may be “converted” into a morally significant entity, and consequently, the argument from potentiality finally succumbs to a reductio ad absurdum. I aim to convey two reasons for skepticism about the innocuousness of the notion of cell convertibility, and hence, the cogency of their argument

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-01-12

Downloads
102 (#53,127)

6 months
527 (#36,719)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas V. Cunningham
Kaiser Permanente West Los Angeles

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Arguing from potential.Stephen Buckle - 1988 - Bioethics 2 (3):227–253.
Arguing From Potential.Stephen Buckle - 1988 - Bioethics 2 (3):227-253.

Add more references