Can the ‘Theory of Mind’ Hypothesis Survive, Given Theoretical Insights Derived from the Study of Autism? A Response to Hacking and McGeer

Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 1 (28):45-54 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I agree with both Ian Hacking and Victoria McGeer that the ‘Theory of Mind’ theory is fundamentally flawed. However, I find reasons to reject both of their critiques of ToM as incoherent and instead build upon certain parts of McGeer’s work to develop my own rejection of ToM. I end by suggesting routes this rejection might take the philosophy of psychology down

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Whats the Story behind Theory of Mind and Autism?Matthew Belmonte - 2009 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 16 (6-8):6-8.
The pathogenesis of autism: insights from congenital blindness.Hobson & Bishop - 2004 - In Uta Frith & Elisabeth Hill (eds.), Autism: Mind and Brain. Oxford University Press.
Understanding autism: insights from mind and brain.Hill & Frith - 2004 - In Uta Frith & Elisabeth Hill (eds.), Autism: Mind and Brain. Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-03

Downloads
8 (#1,302,955)

6 months
2 (#1,214,131)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthew J. Cull
University of Edinburgh

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references