Can the `Theory of Mind’ Hypothesis Survive, Given Theoretical Insights Derived from the Study of Autism? A Response to Hacking and McGeer

Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 28 (1):45-54 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I agree with both Ian Hacking and Victoria McGeer that the ‘Theory of Mind’ theory (ToM) is fundamentally flawed. However, I find reasons to reject both of their critiques of ToM as incoherent and instead build upon certain parts of McGeer’s work to develop my own rejection of ToM. I end by suggesting routes this rejection might take the philosophy of psychology down.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,928

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Whats the Story behind Theory of Mind and Autism?Matthew Belmonte - 2009 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 16 (6-8):6-8.
Autistic self-awareness: Comment.Victoria McGeer - 2004 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 11 (3):235-251.
Hacking’s historical epistemology: a critique of styles of reasoning.Martin Kusch - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (2):158-173.
The trouble with Mary.Victoria McGeer - 2003 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 84 (4):384-393.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-19

Downloads
15 (#947,515)

6 months
4 (#790,347)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthew J. Cull
University of Edinburgh

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations