The Risks of Absolute Medical Confidentiality

Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):107-122 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some ethicists argue that patient confidentiality is absolute and thus should never be broken. I examine these arguments that when critically scrutinised, become porous. I will explore the concept of patient confidentiality and argue that although, this is a very important medical and bioethical issue, this needs to be wisely delivered to reduce third party harm or even detriment to the patient. The argument for absolute confidentiality is particularly weak when it comes to genetic information and inherited disease

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Confidentiality revisited.Ke Yu - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (2):161-172.
A defense of unqualified medical confidentiality.Kenneth Kipnis - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (2):7 – 18.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-06-06

Downloads
157 (#118,714)

6 months
22 (#119,581)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1994 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
Law and medical ethics.J. K. Mason - 1991 - London: LexisNexis UK. Edited by Alexander McCall Smith & G. T. Laurie.
A defense of unqualified medical confidentiality.Kenneth Kipnis - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (2):7 – 18.

View all 34 references / Add more references