A further critique of Reichenbach's cosmological argument

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9 (1):53 - 60 (1978)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The design argument.Elliott Sober - 2004 - In William Mann (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 117–147.
In Defense of the Kalam Cosmological Argument.William Lane Craig - 1997 - Faith and Philosophy 14 (2):236-247.
The cosmological argument: a reassessment.Bruce R. Reichenbach - 1972 - Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas.
A new cosmological argument undone.Michael J. Almeida & Neal D. Judisch - 2002 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 51 (1):55-64.
J. Howard Sobel on the Kalam Cosmological Argument.William Lane Craig - 2006 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 (4):565-84.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
228 (#88,354)

6 months
5 (#637,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William Lane Craig
Houston Baptist University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The cosmological argument and the causal principle.Bruce R. Reichenbach - 1975 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 6 (3):185 - 190.
The cosmological argument: Assessment of a reassessment. [REVIEW]Houston Craighead - 1975 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 6 (2):117 - 124.

Add more references