Theism and the philosophy of nature

Religious Studies 42 (3):273-290 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I argue that traditional theism, in its theory, history, and practice has implications for the philosophy of nature. Namely, nature should be designed around aesthetic or meaningful principles and nature should be engineered in order to fulfil a fairly well defined set of purposes. If theism is true, we should be able to study nature objectively as a teleological system. After all, the teleological structure of nature is more important to us as spiritual beings than its mechanisms. Since a teleological philosophy of nature is no longer viable, traditional theism is untenable. (Published Online July 10 2006)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A response to Cordry on design.Mark Wynn - 2006 - Religious Studies 42 (3):291-297.
Theism and Evolutionary Biology.William Hasker - 2010 - In Charles Taliaferro, Paul Draper & Philip L. Quinn (eds.), A Companion to Philosophy of Religion. Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 548–556.
American Naturalism on Pantheism 1.Martin O. Yalcin - 2011 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 32 (2):156 - 179.
Three Essays on Religion.John Stuart Mill - 1874 - New York: American Mathematical Society. Edited by John Stuart Mill.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
155 (#126,423)

6 months
43 (#97,379)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?