Investigating lexical entries and rules: A typological perspective

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1019-1020 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Research into entries and rules based on English is hampered by the fact that crucial factors coincide. Clahsen avoids this problem and demonstrates his claims by working on German. Seen against the background of the immense variety of the world's languages, this successful move is potentially the first of many possible ones: Several languages offer promising configurations of the factors relevant to Clahsen, and others present new challenges.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Conflicts of Rules in Hooker’s Rule-Consequentialism.Ben Eggleston - 2007 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (3):329-349.
Some problems with the lexical status of nondefault inflection.Peter Indefrey - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1025-1025.
Atomic lexical entries.David Lightfoot - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1029-1030.
Regular versus irregular inflection: A question of levels.Alessandro Laudanna - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1029-1030.
What exactly are lexical concepts?Graeme Hirst - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):45-46.
Four philosophical problems of psycholinguists.George A. Miller - 1970 - Philosophy of Science 37 (2):183-199.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
19 (#793,504)

6 months
1 (#1,469,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references