Beweis der Gleichgewichtungsthese aus der Wahrscheinlichkeitskonzeption epistemischer Ebenbürtigkeit

Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 77 (1):5-16 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his book Meinungsverschiedenheiten (engl.: Disagreement) Marc Andree Weber defends a probability based conception of epistemic peerhood. Starting from this conception he proves the equal weight thesis, which prescribes that one should allocate the same weight to the beliefs of epistemic peers as to one's own beliefs. – In the present article I provide a much shorter proof. For that purpose I first formalize Weber's definition and thesis and I close the argumentative gap between the two of them by making relatively few additions. Toward the end, I will document the differences between Weber's proof and my proof and indicate the relevance of a second proof. No judgmental assessment will be sought.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Erratum to: Disagreeing with the (religious) skeptic. [REVIEW]Tomas Bogardus - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):19-19.
Disagreeing with the (religious) skeptic.Tomas Bogardus - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):5-17.
On Stage One of Feser's 'Aristotelian Proof'.Graham Oppy - 2021 - Religious Studies 57:491-502.
Desacuerdos entre Pares Epistémicos. El Número Importa.Nicolás Francisco Lo Guercio - 2016 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 20 (3):325-341.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-15

Downloads
23 (#672,256)

6 months
17 (#203,322)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Moritz Cordes
Center for Advanced Internet Studies Bochum

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references