Cardinality and Acceptable Abstraction

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 59 (1):61-74 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is widely thought that the acceptability of an abstraction principle is a feature of the cardinalities at which it is satisfiable. This view is called into question by a recent observation by Richard Heck. We show that a fix proposed by Heck fails but we analyze the interesting idea on which it is based, namely that an acceptable abstraction has to “generate” the objects that it requires. We also correct and complete the classification of proposed criteria for acceptable abstraction.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Which abstraction principles are acceptable? Some limitative results.Øystein Linnebo & Gabriel Uzquiano - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (2):239-252.
Some Criteria for Acceptable Abstraction.Øystein Linnebo - 2011 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (3):331-338.
Numerical Abstraction via the Frege Quantifier.G. Aldo Antonelli - 2010 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (2):161-179.
Bad company tamed.Øystein Linnebo - 2009 - Synthese 170 (3):371 - 391.
Introduction.Øystein Linnebo - 2009 - Synthese 170 (3):321-329.
Thin objects.Øystein Linnebo - 2009 - In Hieke Alexander & Leitgeb Hannes (eds.), Reduction, Abstraction, Analysis. Ontos Verlag. pp. 11--227.
Conservativeness, Stability, and Abstraction.Roy T. Cook - 2012 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (3):673-696.
Cardinality and Identity.Massimiliano Carrara & Elisabetta Sacchi - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (5):539-556.
The limits of abstraction. [REVIEW]Øystein Linnebo - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (4):653-656.
Abstraction Relations Need Not Be Reflexive.Jonathan Payne - 2013 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):137-147.
Cardinality Arguments Against Regular Probability Measures.Thomas Hofweber - 2014 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 3 (2):166-175.
Cardinality without Enumeration.Athanassios Tzouvaras - 2005 - Studia Logica 80 (1):121-141.
Bad company and neo-Fregean philosophy.Matti Eklund - 2009 - Synthese 170 (3):393-414.
Weak Cardinality Theorems.Till Tantau - 2005 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (3):861 - 878.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-16

Downloads
110 (#160,204)

6 months
17 (#146,837)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Roy T. Cook
University of St. Andrews
Øystein Linnebo
University of Oslo

Citations of this work

Collective Abstraction.Jon Erling Litland - 2022 - Philosophical Review 131 (4):453-497.
Abstraction and Four Kinds of Invariance.Roy T. Cook - 2017 - Philosophia Mathematica 25 (1):3–25.
Abstraction without exceptions.Luca Zanetti - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (10):3197-3216.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The potential hierarchy of sets.Øystein Linnebo - 2013 - Review of Symbolic Logic 6 (2):205-228.
Frege's theorem.Richard G. Heck - 2011 - New York: Clarendon Press.
Frege’s Theorem: An Introduction.Richard G. Heck - 1999 - The Harvard Review of Philosophy 7 (1):56-73.
The Limits of Abstraction.Kit Fine - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 122 (3):367-395.

View all 14 references / Add more references