Bad company tamed

Synthese 170 (3):371 - 391 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The neo-Fregean project of basing mathematics on abstraction principles faces “the bad company problem,” namely that a great variety of unacceptable abstraction principles are mixed in among the acceptable ones. In this paper I propose a new solution to the problem, based on the idea that individuation must take the form of a well-founded process. A surprising aspect of this solution is that every form of abstraction on concepts is permissible and that paradox is instead avoided by restricting what concepts there are.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bad company generalized.Gabriel Uzquiano - 2009 - Synthese 170 (3):331 - 347.
Which abstraction principles are acceptable? Some limitative results.Øystein Linnebo & Gabriel Uzquiano - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (2):239-252.
Some Criteria for Acceptable Abstraction.Øystein Linnebo - 2011 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (3):331-338.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
267 (#72,263)

6 months
13 (#165,103)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Øystein Linnebo
University of Oslo

Citations of this work

The potential hierarchy of sets.Øystein Linnebo - 2013 - Review of Symbolic Logic 6 (2):205-228.
Cardinality and Acceptable Abstraction.Roy T. Cook & Øystein Linnebo - 2018 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 59 (1):61-74.
Structuralist Neologicism†.Francesca Boccuni & Jack Woods - 2020 - Philosophia Mathematica 28 (3):296-316.
Abstraction Reconceived.J. P. Studd - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (2):579-615.
Collective Abstraction.Jon Erling Litland - 2022 - Philosophical Review 131 (4):453-497.

View all 24 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The limits of abstraction.Kit Fine - 2002 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Matthias Schirn.
Logic, Logic, and Logic.George Boolos - 1998 - Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. Edited by Richard C. Jeffrey.
Fixing Frege.John P. Burgess - 2005 - Princeton University Press.
Basic Laws of Arithmetic.Gottlob Frege - 1893 - Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Edited by Philip A. Ebert, Marcus Rossberg & Crispin Wright.
Logic, Logic and Logic.George Boolos & Richard C. Jeffrey - 1998 - Studia Logica 66 (3):428-432.

View all 28 references / Add more references