Gregory F. Cooper, Constantin F. Aliferis, Richard Ambrosino, John Aronis, Bruce G. Buchanon, Richard Caruana, Michael J. Fine, Clark Glymour, Geoffrey Gordon, Barbara H. Hanusa, Janine E. Janosky, Christopher Meek, Tom Mitchell, Thomas Richardson & Peter Spirtes
AbstractThis paper describes the application of eight statistical and machine-learning methods to derive computer models for predicting mortality of hospital patients with pneumonia from their findings at initial presentation. The eight models were each constructed based on 9847 patient cases and they were each evaluated on 4352 additional cases. The primary evaluation metric was the error in predicted survival as a function of the fraction of patients predicted to survive. This metric is useful in assessing a model’s potential to assist a clinician in deciding whether to treat a given patient in the hospital or at home. We examined the error rates of the models when predicting that a given fraction of patients will survive. We examined survival fractions between 0.1 and 0.6. Over this range, each model’s predictive error rate was within 1% of the error rate of every other model. When predicting that approximately 30°K of the patients will survive, all the models have an error rate of less than 1.5%. The models are distinguished more by the number of variables and parameters that they contain than by their error rates; these differences suggest which models may be the most amenable to future implementation as paper-based guidelines
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Weaving Technology and Policy Together to Maintain Confidentiality.Latanya Sweeney - 1997 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 25 (2-3):98-110.
Similar books and articles
Combining Psychological Models with Machine Learning to Better Predict People’s Decisions.Avi Rosenfeld, Inon Zuckerman, Amos Azaria & Sarit Kraus - 2012 - Synthese 189 (S1):81-93.
Action Models and Their Induction.Michal Čertický - 2013 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 20 (2):206-215.
The Future Has Thicker Tails Than the Past: Model Error as Branching Counterfactuals.Nassim N. Taleb - manuscript
The Error Statistical Philosopher as Normative Naturalist.Deborah Mayo & Jean Miller - 2008 - Synthese 163 (3):305 - 314.
Evaluating Cardiovascular Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes Patients: An Analysis Based on Competing Risks Markov Chains and Additive Regression Models.Rosalba Rosato, G. Ciccone, S. Bo, G. F. Pagano, F. Merletti & D. Gregori - 2007 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (3):422-428.
Are (the Log‐Odds of) Hospital Mortality Rates Normally Distributed? Implications for Studying Variations in Outcomes of Medical Care.Peter C. Austin - 2009 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (3):514-523.
From Reifying Mental Pictures to Reifying Spatial Models.Zenon W. Pylyshyn - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):590-591.
Conventional and Advanced Time Series Estimation: Application to the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Adult Patient Database, 1993–2006.John L. Moran & Patricia J. Solomon - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (1):45-60.
Testing Transitivity in Choice Under Risk.Michael H. Birnbaum & Ulrich Schmidt - 2010 - Theory and Decision 69 (4):599-614.
Error Statistics and Learning From Error: Making a Virtue of Necessity.Deborah G. Mayo - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):212.