- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Strength of perceptual experience predicts word processing performance better than concreteness or imageability
Cognition 125 (3):452-465 (2012)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Formal Distinctiveness of High‐ and Low‐Imageability Nouns: Analyses and Theoretical Implications.Jamie Reilly & Jacob Kean - 2007 - Cognitive Science 31 (1):157-168.
Perceptual behavior as related to factors of associative and drive strength.Jean Engler & James T. Freeman - 1956 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 51 (6):399.
Disorder of colour consciousness: The view from neuropsychology.Glyn W. Humphreys & M. Jane Riddoch - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):956-957.
Imageability and concreteness.John T. E. Richardson - 1976 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 7 (5):429-431.
Fidelity without mimesis: Mental imagery from visual description.Anezka Kuzmicova - 2012 - In Gregory Currie, Petr Kotatko & Martin Pokorny (eds.), Mimesis: Metaphysics, Cognition, Pragmatics. College Publications.
Concreteness of peg words in two mnemonic systems.Dennis J. Delprato & Elizabeth J. Baker - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (3):520.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-12-18
Downloads
40 (#398,309)
6 months
19 (#135,612)
2013-12-18
Downloads
40 (#398,309)
6 months
19 (#135,612)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Language as a disruptive technology: Abstract concepts, embodiment and the flexible mind.Guy Dove - 2018 - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 1752 (373):1-9.
Vision dominates in perceptual language: English sensory vocabulary is optimized for usage.Bodo Winter, Marcus Perlman & Asifa Majid - 2018 - Cognition 179 (C):213-220.
Which words are most iconic?Bodo Winter, Marcus Perlman, Lynn K. Perry & Gary Lupyan - 2017 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 18 (3):443-464.
The Semantic Content of Abstract Concepts: A Property Listing Study of 296 Abstract Words.Marcel Harpaintner, Natalie M. Trumpp & Markus Kiefer - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
References found in this work
Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.Allan Paivio, John C. Yuille & Stephen A. Madigan - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 76 (1p2):1.
A Taste of Words: Linguistic Context and Perceptual Simulation Predict the Modality of Words.Max Louwerse & Louise Connell - 2011 - Cognitive Science 35 (2):381-398.
Content Differences for Abstract and Concrete Concepts.Katja Katja Wiemer-Hastings & Xu Xu - 2005 - Cognitive Science 29 (5):719-736.
Modelling the effects of semantic ambiguity in word recognition.Jennifer M. Rodd, M. Gareth Gaskell & William D. Marslen-Wilson - 2004 - Cognitive Science 28 (1):89-104.
Look but don’t touch: Tactile disadvantage in processing modality-specific words.Louise Connell & Dermot Lynott - 2010 - Cognition 115 (1):1-9.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-zf4z4 uwo