Maclaurin on Occasionalism: A Reply to Ablondi

Journal of Scottish Philosophy 14 (1):125-135 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a recent article Fred Ablondi compares the different approaches to occasionalism put forward by two eighteenth-century Newtonians, Colin Maclaurin and Andrew Baxter. The goal of this short essay is to respond to Ablondi by clarifying some key features of Maclaurin's views on occasionalism and the cause of gravitational attraction. In particular, I explore Maclaurin's matter theory, his views on the explanatory limits of mechanism, and his appeals to the authority of Newton. This leads to a clearer picture of the way in which Maclaurin understood gravitational attraction and the workings of nature

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-13

Downloads
70 (#239,830)

6 months
22 (#129,165)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Patrick J. Connolly
Johns Hopkins University

Citations of this work

What Hume Didn't Notice About Divine Causation.Timothy Yenter - 2021 - In Gregory E. Ganssle (ed.), Philosophical Essays on Divine Causation. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 158-173.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references